Monsters Dark Continent Imdb

bellinisristorante.eu: Monsters - Dark Continent [dt. durch das finstere Zentrum des Monster-Territoriums in den Wüsten des Mittleren Ostens auf. Alien () - IMDb. - Review: MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT Deutsch Am The Old Hag Syndrome - IMDb Bilder Zum Ausdrucken, Gute Filme, Filmposter, Coole. Monsters: Dark Continent 2. Monsters: Dark Continent (). R | min | Action, Drama, Horror. · Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 3. Dawn of the Planet of.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Monsters – Dark Continent: Gegen Aliens oder Menschen im Krieg?

The Voices Sound Department (). The Captain Sound Department (). Known For. Monsters: Dark Continent Sound Department (). Soundtrack. Monsters: Dark Continent (adr recordist). Saphirblau (adr boom operator). 24h Jerusalem (TV Movie documentary) (sound editor). It's Not. Monsters: Dark Continent (foley editor) / (sound effects editor). Bibi & Tina (foley editor). The Voices (sound effects editor). Männer zeigen. Monsters: Dark Continent 2. Monsters: Dark Continent (). R | min | Action, Drama, Horror. · Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 3. Dawn of the Planet of. Monsters Dark Continent. IMDb 4,31 Std. 54 Min+. Sette anni dopo gli eventi di Monsters, le "zone infette" sono ormai diffuse in tutto il globo. Gli esseri. Monsters - Dark Continent [dt./OV]. ()1 Std. 54 Min Dreizehn Jahre nachdem ein Raumschiff mit außerirdischen Lebensformen in Mittelamerika. bellinisristorante.eu - Kaufen Sie Monsters Collection: Monsters / Monsters: Dark Continent günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden.

Monsters: Dark Continent (foley editor) / (sound effects editor). Bibi & Tina (foley editor). The Voices (sound effects editor). Männer zeigen. Monsters - Dark Continent [dt./OV]. ()1 Std. 54 Min Dreizehn Jahre nachdem ein Raumschiff mit außerirdischen Lebensformen in Mittelamerika. - Review: MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT Deutsch Am The Old Hag Syndrome - IMDb Bilder Zum Ausdrucken, Gute Filme, Filmposter, Coole.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb - Filmography

PG 97 min Action, Adventure, Family. Prime Video Rent or Buy 5. Other Lists by daniel-mahlow. Votes: 9, Benachrichtigung bei weiteren Kommentaren Spartacus Blood And Sand Bs E-Mail senden. November's Top Streaming Picks. Show all 13 episodes. Sign In. Name erforderlich. War der Vorgänger als ruhiger Roadtrip eines ungleichen Paars konzipiert, ist die Fortsetzung ein Kriegsdrama um verfeindete Kräfte, die letztlich nicht recht wissen, weshalb sie einander bekämpfen. What to Stream on Prime Video. Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto.

I'm sorry Tom Green but a swing and a miss. This is the most disappointing movie I have seen in a while. I have no idea why they even had "Monsters" in the title or movie for that matter.

They could have saved everyone some time and money by not having monsters at all, seeing as how they only serve as a backdrop for a poor war story, which is really just a 5 minute shoot out and a 3 minute escape.

It starts out with a sad story about some "poor kids" growing up in Detroit, so of course they think they are hard.

They decide to join the army to fight monsters. They get their wish as they kill 1 shortly after arriving in the middle east. And that is about it, other than a few monsters being bombed there is no reason to have monsters in the movie at all.

If you have 2 hours and nothing to do and can't sleep , it might be worth watching. If only to put you to sleep. The first Monsters was fantastic, this I'm sorry to say is not.

Basically it's a US against Middle East war movie with a few monsters thrown in. It felt like the monsters were there just to look like they could do graphics and or create the sequel.

They honestly felt like they were getting in the way of the war film! Nothing at all like the first monsters movie, even with a bigger budget.

The film seamed to go on and on and there was very little plot. The friend I went with fell asleep twice and that was in a packed Premier screening!

Thank goodness we got free tickets to watch it in Nottingham last night as neither of us would want to buy them. I was not really a fan of the first movie; however it was intriguing and nicely setup; by the end it was just a love story.

This one has better budget but aside from more monsters but it is not used properly. There are more monsters but always in the distance and almost no interaction with the characters.

There is the Jordan desert but the movie is basically a war movie; with unlikable characters a lot of screaming and crying and madness but nothing really interesting happens and the movie becomes too long and irritating by the middle so the last hour is really painful to sit through.

If you expect a payoff for the last hour; forget it. Nothing really is clarified or anything surprising occurs.

It is even worse that the movie is not even clear why is going. There are some pro-war moments on the beginning; then tries to show the lack of communication between cultures and languages; later begin a strong anti Arab statement with Muslim terrorists at it worst; but few minutes later a school bus full of dead kids; product of US Air Force attacks to kill a monster and a very nice Bedouin tribe contradicts the previous statements to finally turn to the madness and lack of real intelligence of the Army every dead monster become thousands of new ones; but it seems nobody found that yet.

Nothing is quite original and everything has been show far better and clear before. It is obvious there is some anti-war message in all these; but it is never fully supported.

In brief; it might had been a good idea but is poorly written and developed so do not lose your time. It is not fun at all. It was our last day, so for those last few hours we needed to forget about what was coming.

They have begun to fully take over the entire planet and now with the US military using all of its resources to fight them off they now have to contend with a new type of insurgency.

I will start by saying that I remember seeing the first one, thinking it was a little slow, but it's been so long all I remember about it is the cheesy ending.

I had the same expectations for this one. I was wrong. While I though this one was a little better it was still pretty slow moving and was really missing something the first one had In terms of war movies this one is pretty decent, the problem with it is that every so often a monster would pop up out of nowhere, presumably to remind you the movie is called monsters.

Some movies are deceiving because of the trailers released, they seem funny and are really dramas, etc This is really just another US vs Taliban movie, with an occasional out of place monster thrown in.

Overall, a movie much like Battle LA, if there were no aliens in that movie. I give this a C. MoviesReviews 14 March Story: Monsters: Dark Continent starts with narration from Michael Parkes Keeley a reluctant solider who explains that the monsters have started to spread destroying cities through the Middle East, where the new Infected Zone is.

Frater Harris is a sniper who has completed his mission before making his swift getaway back to the US base. We learn how the unit all has each other's back and will fight anyone to protect each other.

Drugs, booze and hookers this must mean we are having a leaving party because that is what everyone does right?

Well that was a painful excuse to show boobs in a war based film. Now for the real story to start, we are now following the helicopter assault of a heard of giant monsters which is quickly completed.

Frater and Forrest Pinnock run the base and give the new recruits the rules on how to survive the situation. We follow the soldiers on basic missions around towns as we witness the effects of war not just on with the monsters but with the terrorists.

The unit has been on plenty of patrols without seeing much action before they get a mission to locate a group of missing soldiers.

When the convoy gets hit, the mission changes to one of survival against a human enemy as well as a monster threat.

Frater, Michael, Inkelaar and Frankie are the four surviving members of the unit who have to try and stay ahead of the enemy, but aren't very successful.

Before long Frater and Michael are left alone, captured by the enemy they have to escape while the enemy is dealing with a monster attack.

Monsters: Dark Continent moves the action to a different continent and never explains how the monsters ended up in that location considering the first one being set in Mexico.

The most part of this film is a dreadfully boring war story that just has monsters on the outside of it, I am willing to say I don't even know what the point of having the monsters in this film actually is.

The war side of the story has been done so many times it offers nothing to the genre and ends up ruining anything the first film created. I personally think this will be one of the worst stories of the year.

Johnny ends up being a very generic soldier who has been at war too long. Sam fills the generic rookie soldier and doesn't make an impact in the role.

Director Review: Tom Green — Tom doesn't do the original film any justice and gives us one of the most misleading films of the year.

Avoid Best Part: The monsters all look very real. Worst Part: Too Long and no monster action. What Could Have Been Better?

Overall: Very disappoint sequel to one of the best low budget films of recent years. Rating 25 Check out more reviews at moviesreviews ArchonCinemaReviews 7 April The beauty of the original Monsters was its profound statement, Dark Continent satisfies the original naysayer's with action, and not much else.

The initial film Monsters was a profound parable about humanity and its interactions with one another that used an 'alien invasion' as a mirror for this introspection.

It is an independent film I adore and can not recommend enough. Four years later, with seemingly no connection to the original's genius creator Gareth Edwards, Monsters: Dark Continent is released, with absolutely no relation to the film in both scope or talent.

Though the term 'derivative' does not imply subservience in its definition, quite often it is used as a descriptor for inferiority, and Monsters: Dark Continent warrants the adjective.

When I first learned of a sequel to Monsters, I was aghast, for the narrative had been told in its entirety. When I saw the trailer, I was mortified of the bastardization of the beautiful film into Hollywood action drivel.

With the scope of potential from its predecessor being a peak of perfection to the lows of my expectations of pure garbage, Monsters: Dark Continent falls somewhere in the middle but certainly closer to trash.

In truth, Dark Continent tries to be like its original in using the alien invasion to be an allegory for the war efforts in the middle east.

Unfortunately it feels terribly superficial and contrived. There is no beauty in the story telling of Dark Continent. The dialogue is poor and voice overs are used constantly to convey the narrative rather than creative artistry.

Monsters: Dark Continent is neither philosophical nor intelligent in the manner of its originator. Writer and director Tom Green tries to speak of the war but it is in a very ignorant and uninformed perspective that is neither deep or even unique.

Please check out our website for full reviews of all the recent releases. When you watch a movie, when you go into a cinema or search, download, buy any movie, than you are looking for a certain kind of movie a certain genre at that moment, at that time.

When you see title that comes along with any associations of a horror movie than you don't expect a comedy, unless it is a parody or so. But you can read that in a preview or see that from many small parts, like commercial, posters, etc.

Here in this movie, I still don't know what I have watched. It is more or less a try to put a war conflict situation combined with a sci-fi background and a today's Afghanistan war, culture etc.

Conflict, into a movie. A try to show a social conflict but there are so many way better movie like this on the market out there.

The movie has no beginning and no end. The only credits I can give for this movie is the making. The scenes are good, the clothing, wearing's, the monsters those few which actually have not a big part in this movie at all.

So at the end this is a complete waste of time and if you don't want to spent time after seeing the movie to think about all the little, stupid and no logical scenes and parts of the movie and shaking your head, whenever you think back of it, then do something better with your time.

I don't understand why people give this movie and the standalone prequel so much hate. Who wants yet another monster disaster movie shoved in your face?

Both Monsters movies heavily focus on human interaction and the development of the main characters when put in extreme circumstances. With regards this film specifically - what the main characters go through mentally could easily be mirrored by actual soldiers overseas today but the fact that the main enemy is not of this world, puts a different and interesting perspective on war.

Yet what I think Monsters is trying to say, is that the truth is still the same. This movie is littered with ambiguity and symbolism - do the aliens symbolize terrorism or something else altogether?

Who knows. The point is, this movie lets you make up your own mind without giving you any definitive answers - contrary to most films today, that plainly dictate what the audience should think or feel.

Monsters is absolutely stunning visually and has a soundtrack to match. I think it's only downfall, and that of its predecessor, is how it was advertised.

Maybe this was done on purpose but I think it is the main cause of the majority of its bad reviews. If you want to go watch an action packed disaster movie, don't bother watching.

And definitely don't bother writing a bad review. It's boring. This movie is NOT a sci-fi movie. The cinematography is nice.

Acting is OK. But the movie has Zero plot and just doesn't go anywhere. The main problem is with the story or lack thereof.

The movie suggests scifi since the monsters supposedly come from outer space. But this movie does nothing to talk about where the monsters come from and what their plan is or anything like that.

The monsters seem more like African Elephants moving around in large herds - who make whale like sounds. This movie deserves to be a horror movie coz its a horrible waste of your precious time.

Avoid at all costs. The first movie was bad, this is worse! I started feeling annoyed after only watching the first 10 minutes.

These 4 young men were like little kids and I just hope the Army doesn't really have men with this type of mentality.

The movie really had nothing to do with monsters. They were only put there to make the movie more interesting.

It centers more these men and the war. Yes, kill a few monsters and jump up and down with joy. Some scenes were a little shocking and the scene with the dog fighting a baby alien while these uneducated dead heads watched and cheered was something that I thought shouldn't have been included in the movie.

Especially when the poor dog gets killed by the alien and then some thug shoots the Alien. The acting wasn't too bad but I felt it went a little over board.

I was hoping the film would finish earlier than it's 2 hours or so. I was getting fed up with the war and wanted more of the Monsters but disappointingly, I had to see through gun fire, screaming and nonsense.

The title really has nothing to do with the movie. Waste of time unless you like war films, people firing guns at each other and a story line which to me didn't make much sense.

Sminthian1 6 June I liked the first one and was hoping that they were going to continue and explain more about the monsters.

There seems to be a different kind of monsters in this one, and they don't really explain it at all. This is made out to be mostly a war movie.

It's a few losers from the inner-city just skip the first 15 minutes of the movie or you won't want to watch the rest that get sent to war in the mid-East.

They spend the whole time in shock or crying whenever any fighting happens, which I find extremely annoying. The new monsters seem interesting, even though they didn't explain it at all.

Everything else in the movie was bad. I had to force myself to watch this in three sections because I kept getting tired of it.

Hschuntermann 16 March I think people are being way to harsh on the movie. I mean I watch a lot of films and I've seen nothing but mediocre and trash in the last 2 weeks.

When I saw this i wasn't blown away nor was it as good as the first. That being said, this is an entirely different movie. I was never bored.

If anything it kept me pretty edgy. The movie had a feeling of dread. It isn't a horror movie, neither was the first one. I considered it a science fiction movie and a war movie.

I'm going to check it out again. I think anyone who is tying to decide to watch it or not. Then skip all the opinions from strangers and just watch it.

I loved the first Monsters and had big expectations for the sequel and I wasn't disappointed. I find science fiction fans can be harsh sometimes just like horror fans.

Movies are personal. What one finds sucky another may find gold. That says something. I'm not going to give you a massive review on why, but this film is beyond diabolical.

It's like a child trying to be an adult, it can't and it does a very poor attempt at trying. It should have been an excellent film with the idea, but the actors over act, half the time, you don't really even know what is going on.

I will admit that the visuals can be quite stunning, but it's just ruined by everything else. The cutting from one scene to another is just annoying.

View More. I am surprised for the production quality. It was comparable to those big productions, so no doubt the visuals played its part accurately.

Then what makes this film bad? Well, the story is the biggest issue here. It is a confusion screenplay, not for the viewers, but seems for the writers.

Looks they don't know how to develop and end it with their decent opening. It was more focused on the military operation than conflict between the man and the monsters.

How come when monsters taking over the earth is not considered a threat, but fig View Edit History.

Login to edit. Keyboard Shortcuts. Login to report an issue. You need to be logged in to continue. Click here to login or here to sign up.

We use cookies to help give you a better experience on TMDb.

Ähnliche Beiträge. Wenn du die Website weiterhin nutzt, stimmst du der Verwendung von Fast And Furious 8 Subtitrat In Romana zu. When everything suddenly goes dark, Nic regains consciousness - only to find himself in a waking nightmare. Durch die Wüste. Vier Kumpels aus Detroit …. Votes: 9, Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Schitto's work have you seen? Ein Wesen läuft mit. Discover what Sylvie Vartan watch this November including a Marvel docu-series, a '90s reboot, and a Star Wars holiday celebration. Tell us what you think about this feature. Ähnliche Beiträge. Jens bei Ingenium — Indieperle aus deut….

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Sinopsis film Video

MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT - Official Trailer

There are some pro-war moments on the beginning; then tries to show the lack of communication between cultures and languages; later begin a strong anti Arab statement with Muslim terrorists at it worst; but few minutes later a school bus full of dead kids; product of US Air Force attacks to kill a monster and a very nice Bedouin tribe contradicts the previous statements to finally turn to the madness and lack of real intelligence of the Army every dead monster become thousands of new ones; but it seems nobody found that yet.

Nothing is quite original and everything has been show far better and clear before. It is obvious there is some anti-war message in all these; but it is never fully supported.

In brief; it might had been a good idea but is poorly written and developed so do not lose your time. It is not fun at all.

It was our last day, so for those last few hours we needed to forget about what was coming. They have begun to fully take over the entire planet and now with the US military using all of its resources to fight them off they now have to contend with a new type of insurgency.

I will start by saying that I remember seeing the first one, thinking it was a little slow, but it's been so long all I remember about it is the cheesy ending.

I had the same expectations for this one. I was wrong. While I though this one was a little better it was still pretty slow moving and was really missing something the first one had In terms of war movies this one is pretty decent, the problem with it is that every so often a monster would pop up out of nowhere, presumably to remind you the movie is called monsters.

Some movies are deceiving because of the trailers released, they seem funny and are really dramas, etc This is really just another US vs Taliban movie, with an occasional out of place monster thrown in.

Overall, a movie much like Battle LA, if there were no aliens in that movie. I give this a C. MoviesReviews 14 March Story: Monsters: Dark Continent starts with narration from Michael Parkes Keeley a reluctant solider who explains that the monsters have started to spread destroying cities through the Middle East, where the new Infected Zone is.

Frater Harris is a sniper who has completed his mission before making his swift getaway back to the US base. We learn how the unit all has each other's back and will fight anyone to protect each other.

Drugs, booze and hookers this must mean we are having a leaving party because that is what everyone does right? Well that was a painful excuse to show boobs in a war based film.

Now for the real story to start, we are now following the helicopter assault of a heard of giant monsters which is quickly completed.

Frater and Forrest Pinnock run the base and give the new recruits the rules on how to survive the situation. We follow the soldiers on basic missions around towns as we witness the effects of war not just on with the monsters but with the terrorists.

The unit has been on plenty of patrols without seeing much action before they get a mission to locate a group of missing soldiers.

When the convoy gets hit, the mission changes to one of survival against a human enemy as well as a monster threat. Frater, Michael, Inkelaar and Frankie are the four surviving members of the unit who have to try and stay ahead of the enemy, but aren't very successful.

Before long Frater and Michael are left alone, captured by the enemy they have to escape while the enemy is dealing with a monster attack.

Monsters: Dark Continent moves the action to a different continent and never explains how the monsters ended up in that location considering the first one being set in Mexico.

The most part of this film is a dreadfully boring war story that just has monsters on the outside of it, I am willing to say I don't even know what the point of having the monsters in this film actually is.

The war side of the story has been done so many times it offers nothing to the genre and ends up ruining anything the first film created. I personally think this will be one of the worst stories of the year.

Johnny ends up being a very generic soldier who has been at war too long. Sam fills the generic rookie soldier and doesn't make an impact in the role.

Director Review: Tom Green — Tom doesn't do the original film any justice and gives us one of the most misleading films of the year.

Avoid Best Part: The monsters all look very real. Worst Part: Too Long and no monster action. What Could Have Been Better?

Overall: Very disappoint sequel to one of the best low budget films of recent years. Rating 25 Check out more reviews at moviesreviews ArchonCinemaReviews 7 April The beauty of the original Monsters was its profound statement, Dark Continent satisfies the original naysayer's with action, and not much else.

The initial film Monsters was a profound parable about humanity and its interactions with one another that used an 'alien invasion' as a mirror for this introspection.

It is an independent film I adore and can not recommend enough. Four years later, with seemingly no connection to the original's genius creator Gareth Edwards, Monsters: Dark Continent is released, with absolutely no relation to the film in both scope or talent.

Though the term 'derivative' does not imply subservience in its definition, quite often it is used as a descriptor for inferiority, and Monsters: Dark Continent warrants the adjective.

When I first learned of a sequel to Monsters, I was aghast, for the narrative had been told in its entirety.

When I saw the trailer, I was mortified of the bastardization of the beautiful film into Hollywood action drivel.

With the scope of potential from its predecessor being a peak of perfection to the lows of my expectations of pure garbage, Monsters: Dark Continent falls somewhere in the middle but certainly closer to trash.

In truth, Dark Continent tries to be like its original in using the alien invasion to be an allegory for the war efforts in the middle east. Unfortunately it feels terribly superficial and contrived.

There is no beauty in the story telling of Dark Continent. The dialogue is poor and voice overs are used constantly to convey the narrative rather than creative artistry.

Monsters: Dark Continent is neither philosophical nor intelligent in the manner of its originator. Writer and director Tom Green tries to speak of the war but it is in a very ignorant and uninformed perspective that is neither deep or even unique.

Please check out our website for full reviews of all the recent releases. When you watch a movie, when you go into a cinema or search, download, buy any movie, than you are looking for a certain kind of movie a certain genre at that moment, at that time.

When you see title that comes along with any associations of a horror movie than you don't expect a comedy, unless it is a parody or so.

But you can read that in a preview or see that from many small parts, like commercial, posters, etc. Here in this movie, I still don't know what I have watched.

It is more or less a try to put a war conflict situation combined with a sci-fi background and a today's Afghanistan war, culture etc.

Conflict, into a movie. A try to show a social conflict but there are so many way better movie like this on the market out there.

The movie has no beginning and no end. The only credits I can give for this movie is the making. The scenes are good, the clothing, wearing's, the monsters those few which actually have not a big part in this movie at all.

So at the end this is a complete waste of time and if you don't want to spent time after seeing the movie to think about all the little, stupid and no logical scenes and parts of the movie and shaking your head, whenever you think back of it, then do something better with your time.

I don't understand why people give this movie and the standalone prequel so much hate. Who wants yet another monster disaster movie shoved in your face?

Both Monsters movies heavily focus on human interaction and the development of the main characters when put in extreme circumstances. With regards this film specifically - what the main characters go through mentally could easily be mirrored by actual soldiers overseas today but the fact that the main enemy is not of this world, puts a different and interesting perspective on war.

Yet what I think Monsters is trying to say, is that the truth is still the same. This movie is littered with ambiguity and symbolism - do the aliens symbolize terrorism or something else altogether?

Who knows. The point is, this movie lets you make up your own mind without giving you any definitive answers - contrary to most films today, that plainly dictate what the audience should think or feel.

Monsters is absolutely stunning visually and has a soundtrack to match. I think it's only downfall, and that of its predecessor, is how it was advertised.

Maybe this was done on purpose but I think it is the main cause of the majority of its bad reviews. If you want to go watch an action packed disaster movie, don't bother watching.

And definitely don't bother writing a bad review. It's boring. This movie is NOT a sci-fi movie. The cinematography is nice. Acting is OK. But the movie has Zero plot and just doesn't go anywhere.

The main problem is with the story or lack thereof. The movie suggests scifi since the monsters supposedly come from outer space. But this movie does nothing to talk about where the monsters come from and what their plan is or anything like that.

The monsters seem more like African Elephants moving around in large herds - who make whale like sounds. This movie deserves to be a horror movie coz its a horrible waste of your precious time.

Avoid at all costs. The first movie was bad, this is worse! I started feeling annoyed after only watching the first 10 minutes.

These 4 young men were like little kids and I just hope the Army doesn't really have men with this type of mentality. The movie really had nothing to do with monsters.

They were only put there to make the movie more interesting. It centers more these men and the war.

Yes, kill a few monsters and jump up and down with joy. Some scenes were a little shocking and the scene with the dog fighting a baby alien while these uneducated dead heads watched and cheered was something that I thought shouldn't have been included in the movie.

Especially when the poor dog gets killed by the alien and then some thug shoots the Alien. The acting wasn't too bad but I felt it went a little over board.

I was hoping the film would finish earlier than it's 2 hours or so. I was getting fed up with the war and wanted more of the Monsters but disappointingly, I had to see through gun fire, screaming and nonsense.

The title really has nothing to do with the movie. Waste of time unless you like war films, people firing guns at each other and a story line which to me didn't make much sense.

Sminthian1 6 June I liked the first one and was hoping that they were going to continue and explain more about the monsters. There seems to be a different kind of monsters in this one, and they don't really explain it at all.

This is made out to be mostly a war movie. It's a few losers from the inner-city just skip the first 15 minutes of the movie or you won't want to watch the rest that get sent to war in the mid-East.

They spend the whole time in shock or crying whenever any fighting happens, which I find extremely annoying. The new monsters seem interesting, even though they didn't explain it at all.

Everything else in the movie was bad. I had to force myself to watch this in three sections because I kept getting tired of it.

Hschuntermann 16 March I think people are being way to harsh on the movie. I mean I watch a lot of films and I've seen nothing but mediocre and trash in the last 2 weeks.

When I saw this i wasn't blown away nor was it as good as the first. That being said, this is an entirely different movie. I was never bored.

If anything it kept me pretty edgy. The movie had a feeling of dread. It isn't a horror movie, neither was the first one. I considered it a science fiction movie and a war movie.

I'm going to check it out again. I think anyone who is tying to decide to watch it or not. Then skip all the opinions from strangers and just watch it.

I loved the first Monsters and had big expectations for the sequel and I wasn't disappointed. I find science fiction fans can be harsh sometimes just like horror fans.

Movies are personal. What one finds sucky another may find gold. That says something. I'm not going to give you a massive review on why, but this film is beyond diabolical.

It's like a child trying to be an adult, it can't and it does a very poor attempt at trying. It should have been an excellent film with the idea, but the actors over act, half the time, you don't really even know what is going on.

I will admit that the visuals can be quite stunning, but it's just ruined by everything else. The cutting from one scene to another is just annoying.

The movie is called Monsters, but similar to the first, the monsters have so little to do with the story, even more so in the second than the first.

It's all about male bonding during military time as a platoon of boys from the same hood in Detroit go to war together in the Middle East. The picture moves quickly, never a dull moment, very kinetic movement.

Good action and lots of good war scenes. The acting could used improvement. All the screaming and crotch grabbing did not convince me of their military standpoint.

But director Tom Green is definitely a good visual artist here. The imagery was very instance. Very good cinematography. Visual effects were decent as well.

Total exploitation of war that ads a sci-fi fantasy elements with the monsters, used only as a backdrop no different than the dessert the movie takes place in.

Overall, I like the movie, despite how little the monsters have to do with the story at all. It seems misleading going into it, however.

Excellent hard hitting war film but not Monsters. An American platoon on a mission to extract four comrades are ambushed by enemy soldiers and must find their way to the extraction point through the alien infested Middle East.

Inkeeping with the format of the first film the aliens are a background entity to the main plot. Written by Jay Basu and Tom Green, aside from some tidbits of their off spring this follow up offers no great revelations about the aliens.

Monsters: Dark Continent feels more of a sequel to a different alien film than Gareth Edwards first outing.

The effects are great, especially the larger Monsters when on display. The acting is outstanding from the cast.

Oozing screen presence is Johnny Harris who is notable as the slowly unhinging Noah. Director Green offers a hard hitting war film that pulls no punches with mines, limbs, madness and pressure on display.

Yes the analogies of the worlds conflicts is pushed in your face from outset, American politics, warfare, air strikes and its effects on the local inhabitants and the occupying soldiers.

If anything, as the soldiers get picked off one by one it's a little too real, relevant and close to the bone. The bombed school bus of children, torture and mine scenes spring to mind.

American soldiers are being sent abroad to protect US interests from the Monsters, but the war is far from being won.

View More. I am surprised for the production quality. It was comparable to those big productions, so no doubt the visuals played its part accurately.

Then what makes this film bad? Well, the story is the biggest issue here. It is a confusion screenplay, not for the viewers, but seems for the writers.

Looks they don't know how to develop and end it with their decent opening. It was more focused on the military operation than conflict between the man and the monsters.

How come when monsters taking over the earth is not considered a threat, but fig View Edit History. Login to edit. Keyboard Shortcuts. Login to report an issue.

You need to be logged in to continue. Click here to login or here to sign up.

- Review: MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT Deutsch Am The Old Hag Syndrome - IMDb Bilder Zum Ausdrucken, Gute Filme, Filmposter, Coole. bellinisristorante.eu: Monsters - Dark Continent [dt. durch das finstere Zentrum des Monster-Territoriums in den Wüsten des Mittleren Ostens auf. Alien () - IMDb. Monsters – Dark Continent SF-Kriegsdrama // „Monsters“ kam aus dem Nichts. Das mit Methoden des Guerrilla Filmmaking gedrehte. I see the monsters as symbolic of terrorists, fascist leaders, etc. To Greens credit it stands on its own, it's dusty location setting adds to the tense ominous war atmosphere and Dark Continent shows the grim side of humanity. It's called Monster: The Dark Continent. When you see One Piece Im that comes along with any associations of a horror movie than you don't expect a comedy, Scrubs Mein Musical it is a parody or so. Liadtella 14 October The scenes are good, the clothing, wearing's, the monsters those few which actually have not a big part in Punisher Staffel 3 movie at all. And it's not even a very good war movie at that. The acting wasn't too bad but I felt it went a little over board.